Are You Brave Enough for AMIS?
A Familiar Story…
“Over the years the company has grown comfortably. Er.., well.., perhaps a little, how should I put it, difficult. We have had to cut back on production staff and some of the engineering lads have had to double up now we are not recruiting for those who have either left the company or retired.
The production machines are not the most modern, but seem to be holding up well. We got a couple of auto-mixers from our Norfolk site recently and although they were of a different make and design from our own mixers we try to maintain them like the others. So far so good! It is a pity that I do not have any maintenance records for them. Ours are a bit patchy because no one seems to have the time to put it all down on paper, let alone a spreadsheet!
The big problem I have is what happens if we get a major breakdown. Head of Engineering at HQ would not be best pleased if one of the four lines stopped as they rely on us for ingredient formulation pre mixes.
I can cope with minor line disruptions, the ordinary line operators are still a bit flaky about what to do if we had an emergency shut down, but one of the engineers is usually about, and will do his best to retrieve the situation. I can’t seem to get staff interested in looking after the equipment though. They say it is not their job and I do not have enough engineers to be on standby all the time.”
Do You Recognise Any of the Symptons?
Perhaps a worst-case scenario, but we are sure many large and small company directors and managers will recognise some of these symptoms within their own organisations. Indeed this example also points up the additional need for specialist training of operatives.
At MCP we see situations like this all the time, so you are not alone!
The First Step – How do you assess where you are?
The starting point is to assess a company’s current asset status. This should be achieved by carrying out an audit of the company’s operations – in our case we use the AMIS Assessment. Originally sponsored by the DTI (now DBERR) we have developed this standard assessment and audit tool as an internationally recognised benchmark.
How do you benchmark?
The assessment should determine the degree of compliance/benchmarking against a best practice model. The assessment should be concerned with, and be applicable to, the operation and care of physical assets, whether these are industrial or facilities-based.
The goal is to achieve optimum life cycle cost with maximum availability, performance efficiency and the highest quality.
This should form the essential foundation of any programme. It should provide the means to measure, on an objective basis, a company’s approach to maintenance and asset management, and be designed to assess and provide scores for the key aspects of asset management and operation. This will typically include:
Work management
Maintenance effectiveness
Manufacturing equipment management
Performance management
Workplace organisation
Contractor management
The assessment should identify strengths and weaknesses and provide the basis for developing an improvement plan. It should also provide a series of benchmark scores against industry-specific results. (Note: Since its inception, over 6,000 sites worldwide have used the AMIS model to devise and implement effective improvement programmes for managing the maintenance of their physical assets.)
How do I implement best practice in my asset management programme?
The assessment guidelines should provide the key information required for implementing an asset management improvement programme. Its purpose should be to identify the roles and responsibilities for each element of the best practice model, the stages of implementation and detailed step-by-step activities.
How your staff can implement best practice through training?
The programme should contain training materials designed to provide awareness and understanding of best practice, these should include:
Knowledge of the topic concepts
Practical examples
Exercises
Each module should be designed to enable trainees to implement best practice, deliver improvements and create ownership of the programmes they have developed and the assets they relate to.
Performance Monitoring
This provides the means to measure performance and drive improvements through performance management and continuous improvement. The appropriate equipment and maintenance key performance indicators should be selected based on the industry sector and business needs and a balanced scorecard developed.
The process for reviewing actual performance and initiating improvement actions should also include a tracking system for improvement ideas.
Why one needs efficiency in maintenance
The need to demonstrate and deliver high-performance increases daily. More and more organisations are coming under the scrutiny of external regulations who require them to demonstrate that their operations are founded on good, and ideally, best practices. At a company level, boards of directors are required to demonstrate responsibility for their company’s physical assets and ensure a safe working environment for their employees, that will generate the required return on investment.
Applications (for example the AMIS best practice programme) help meet these requirements by:
Defining consistent ways of working
Ensuring a process for effective management exists to provide the basis for driving increased return on investment
What sort of results should I see?
The average savings from a typical improvement programme for a site employing, say, 250 – 300 people, can be in the order of £150-300k – a very worthwhile benefit. However, examples exist where the savings achieved have been of an order of magnitude greater. Take the actual results from a pharmaceutical manufacturing site employing 400 people with a transfer value of £100m, a maintenance budget of £4m and operating costs of £40m:
Table 1
The financial savings achieved, broken down by departments and activities, totalled £4,233k and are shown in Table 1 above.
The audit process identified the following areas where there was considerable room for improvement:
The site’s overall maintenance engineering effectiveness combined score was 44% which places the department in the ‘Control’ category. A world-class performing site would be greater than 75%.
The assessment flagged up several opportunities for the site to further develop its strong capability and reduce operating costs in the form of released Man Hours/OEE improvement and financial benefits.
Also, there was a possibility of increasing OEE by at least 12%.
A word about operator training
An essential part of any audit process, and subsequent improvement programme, should be to highlight and lay plans for operator training. A recent report undertaken by MCP highlighted the continuing lack of investment in technical skills which, coupled with the increasing age of the current skilled workforce, indicates a growing problem for employers in the coming years. Already in some parts of the country, it is nearly impossible to find qualified and competent electricians and process instrumentation engineers.
The problem is not going to go away. Whilst the numbers employed in the manufacturing sector continue to decrease, we see employment opportunities for the technically skilled increasing in the building services, warehousing and facilities management sectors. There is, therefore, a need to continue to drive home the importance of providing good training programmes.
